<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://mountaintownnews.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mountaintownnews.net</link>
	<description>Welcome To Mountain Town News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The odd couple of greenhouse gas reduction in Colorado by The Odd Couple Of Greenhouse Gas Reduction In Colorado &#124; Davis Drilling Consulting</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=765#comment-5364</link>
		<dc:creator>The Odd Couple Of Greenhouse Gas Reduction In Colorado &#124; Davis Drilling Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=765#comment-5364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read full article at: mountaintownnews.net [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read full article at: mountaintownnews.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space travel from two miles high by Mike Mongo</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=512#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=512#comment-4349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in space industry and you had me to the very last sentence. Bravo! Bravo! ;D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in space industry and you had me to the very last sentence. Bravo! Bravo! ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Putting chips on the shoulder of I-70 by Patrick Hunter</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=660#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=660#comment-4278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the bottlenecks on I70 aren&#039;t such a bad thing.  It creates some restriction on growth in the mountain communities.  Such communities are already grossly unsustainable.  If snowfalls continue to dwindle we can expect reduced revenues from skiing and shortages of water for use in the mountain towns as well as the eastern slope.
Why exacerbate the problem?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the bottlenecks on I70 aren&#8217;t such a bad thing.  It creates some restriction on growth in the mountain communities.  Such communities are already grossly unsustainable.  If snowfalls continue to dwindle we can expect reduced revenues from skiing and shortages of water for use in the mountain towns as well as the eastern slope.<br />
Why exacerbate the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ho-hum ski season as severe drought enters second year by Patrick Hunter</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=544#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=544#comment-4277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read your column &quot;Smug Alert&quot; (titled) in Glenwood Spgs. Post Independent.  Spot on!  I have written on the subject in the Carbondale (note &quot;carbon&quot;) paper Sopris Sun.  In the same vein; excuse the pun.  Of course, the local opposition is blatant hypocrisy.  It is also a terrific fundraiser for ngo&#039;s.  
There is some exciting developments in methane capture from coal mines.  To take that a step farther, our local coal mines could be a future source of methane to replace natural gas.  The gas line network already exists, in large part. The process is &quot;in situ&quot; so the effect on the surroundings could be minimal.  
There are also some very troubling stories emerging about a natural gas &quot;bubble&quot;.  
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fracked-up-usa-shale-gas-bubble/5326504    
And earlier in the NY Times.  The NYT article came in for much criticism.  Not disputed is that current &quot;actual&quot;  &quot;reserves&quot; are estimated at about 11 years at current rates of consumption.  Consumption is supposed to increase enormously in a shift away from coal and to add use in transportation.  THAT&#039;S ALL?  So what are we supposed to do 12 years from now?
Thanks for making such a good addition to the dialog.
Best regards,
Pat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your column &#8220;Smug Alert&#8221; (titled) in Glenwood Spgs. Post Independent.  Spot on!  I have written on the subject in the Carbondale (note &#8220;carbon&#8221;) paper Sopris Sun.  In the same vein; excuse the pun.  Of course, the local opposition is blatant hypocrisy.  It is also a terrific fundraiser for ngo&#8217;s.<br />
There is some exciting developments in methane capture from coal mines.  To take that a step farther, our local coal mines could be a future source of methane to replace natural gas.  The gas line network already exists, in large part. The process is &#8220;in situ&#8221; so the effect on the surroundings could be minimal.<br />
There are also some very troubling stories emerging about a natural gas &#8220;bubble&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fracked-up-usa-shale-gas-bubble/5326504" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-fracked-up-usa-shale-gas-bubble/5326504</a><br />
And earlier in the NY Times.  The NYT article came in for much criticism.  Not disputed is that current &#8220;actual&#8221;  &#8220;reserves&#8221; are estimated at about 11 years at current rates of consumption.  Consumption is supposed to increase enormously in a shift away from coal and to add use in transportation.  THAT&#8217;S ALL?  So what are we supposed to do 12 years from now?<br />
Thanks for making such a good addition to the dialog.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Putting chips on the shoulder of I-70 by Tom Sorensen</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=660#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Sorensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=660#comment-4258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Start the damn monorail project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start the damn monorail project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About: MTN by Al Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?page_id=2#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?page_id=2#comment-2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Referencing your Post Article of March 3, 2013 re: water in t6he west.

Part of our negotiation on the Keystone pipeline should be an additional pipeline to  bring water down from Alaska to the lower 48. 

The water and oil pipeline could run straight down thru MT, WY into CO and then on south.

Cost effective and painless to all except our Enviorenmentalist Friends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referencing your Post Article of March 3, 2013 re: water in t6he west.</p>
<p>Part of our negotiation on the Keystone pipeline should be an additional pipeline to  bring water down from Alaska to the lower 48. </p>
<p>The water and oil pipeline could run straight down thru MT, WY into CO and then on south.</p>
<p>Cost effective and painless to all except our Enviorenmentalist Friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colorado River Basin Supply and Demand Study by allen.best</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>allen.best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question Ben -- and someday I intend to get to Castlewood Canyon.

One place is at the Bureau of Reclamation&#039;s website: http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy.html. 

My friend Ken Neubecker, who lives in Carbondale, is a very good source, and he has a website called Western Rivers Institute. http://westernriversinstitute.org

In  Colorado, the lead state water agency is the Colorado WAter Conservation Board.

On the Western Slope, the key organization is the Colorado River Water Conservation District. Quick googles will find you   websites for each. At the latter, as regards the Colorado River, you want to check out a paper by Eric Kuhn, the general manger. It&#039;s on the bar at the right side of the page. Oh heck, here it is: http://www.crwcd.org/page_253

John Orr, who works for Westminster, tracks Colroado water matters at a website called Coyote Gulch.

As for where the water goes to these various cities, that&#039;s just something I gleaned from my writing about water during the last 12 years. In that time, I did much writing about water for Colorado Biz Magazine, Headwaters, the Vail Daily, Planning Magazine and I forget who else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Ben &#8212; and someday I intend to get to Castlewood Canyon.</p>
<p>One place is at the Bureau of Reclamation&#8217;s website: <a href="http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy.html</a>. </p>
<p>My friend Ken Neubecker, who lives in Carbondale, is a very good source, and he has a website called Western Rivers Institute. <a href="http://westernriversinstitute.org" rel="nofollow">http://westernriversinstitute.org</a></p>
<p>In  Colorado, the lead state water agency is the Colorado WAter Conservation Board.</p>
<p>On the Western Slope, the key organization is the Colorado River Water Conservation District. Quick googles will find you   websites for each. At the latter, as regards the Colorado River, you want to check out a paper by Eric Kuhn, the general manger. It&#8217;s on the bar at the right side of the page. Oh heck, here it is: <a href="http://www.crwcd.org/page_253" rel="nofollow">http://www.crwcd.org/page_253</a></p>
<p>John Orr, who works for Westminster, tracks Colroado water matters at a website called Coyote Gulch.</p>
<p>As for where the water goes to these various cities, that&#8217;s just something I gleaned from my writing about water during the last 12 years. In that time, I did much writing about water for Colorado Biz Magazine, Headwaters, the Vail Daily, Planning Magazine and I forget who else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colorado River Basin Supply and Demand Study by Ben Parker</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article.  As a Volunteer Naturalist at Castlewood Canyon State Park, I have had a long standing interest in water issues in Colorado and the west and I have a public hike where people can touch one of the Denver Basin auquifers to learn where our limited water comes from.  You mention in in your article that Cheyenne, Salt Lake City and Albuquerque all get some part of their water supply from the Colorado or its tributaries.  Where can I learn more about this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  As a Volunteer Naturalist at Castlewood Canyon State Park, I have had a long standing interest in water issues in Colorado and the west and I have a public hike where people can touch one of the Denver Basin auquifers to learn where our limited water comes from.  You mention in in your article that Cheyenne, Salt Lake City and Albuquerque all get some part of their water supply from the Colorado or its tributaries.  Where can I learn more about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colorado River Basin Supply and Demand Study by dennis berry</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?p=569#comment-2401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading your article on sunday about crazy water ideas  how stupid can people be?  I was in the overhead door business for 25 years. We started supplying doors , when  DIA moved,  to the housing projects btween hwy 2 and tower blvd. That land was pretty much shit land  SANDY  not very water friendly and yet  the houses and townhomes and etc  HAD TO HAVE yards.  How much water could have been saved in CO in the last 15 years  if   ALL  new housing projects anywhere would have been put on zeroscape?   No water for yards!!!  Now I see Denver is going to start water restrictions to maybe watering twice a week?  Maybe  this is somthing to bring att. to your readers    thanks  dennis berry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your article on sunday about crazy water ideas  how stupid can people be?  I was in the overhead door business for 25 years. We started supplying doors , when  DIA moved,  to the housing projects btween hwy 2 and tower blvd. That land was pretty much shit land  SANDY  not very water friendly and yet  the houses and townhomes and etc  HAD TO HAVE yards.  How much water could have been saved in CO in the last 15 years  if   ALL  new housing projects anywhere would have been put on zeroscape?   No water for yards!!!  Now I see Denver is going to start water restrictions to maybe watering twice a week?  Maybe  this is somthing to bring att. to your readers    thanks  dennis berry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About: MTN by Dennis Martin</title>
		<link>http://mountaintownnews.net/?page_id=2#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 04:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountaintownnews.net/?page_id=2#comment-2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen I read with interest your March 3, 2013 Denver Post article &quot;When it comes to water in the West&quot;.  I am not a water expert but I drink it therefore I am interested in maintaining a consistent supply.

Desalination has always seemed like a &quot;natural fix&quot; to me since we have adequate shoreline from which to pull seawater.  Although the costs you quoted for desalination of seawater from the Gulf of California at $2100/acre foot are high.

I googled Israel desalination since they have a few (maybe 4) plants doing this with their mostly costly plant desalting for approximately $740/acre foot.  Other countries such as Cyprus, Trinidad, Algeria, and Australia are desalting their water and Tampa, Florida has a plant working in conjunction with  Tampa Electric&#039;s Big Bend Power Plant.

The Chairman of Water Desalination Administration in Israel, Abraham Tenne, feels it is necessary to expand desalination capacity in Israel in light of potential climate change (warming) in order to have a dependable water supply.  Google Israel desalination and his name and you can see his paper and the costs of water production for his and other countries&#039; plants although the costs are in cubic meters of water (good math practice).  

If California and Nevada need more water they should start building ocean water desalination plants and either use our abundant natural gas to power the process or renewable energy - solar, wind, wave action, geothermal etc.  

Water is a precious commodity and looks to become more so as evidenced by the reduced flow in the Mississippi and the lower level in the great lakes.  We should learn a lesson from those countries located in dry areas that have already built desalination plants and consider their business model.

Dennis Martin
Centennial]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen I read with interest your March 3, 2013 Denver Post article &#8220;When it comes to water in the West&#8221;.  I am not a water expert but I drink it therefore I am interested in maintaining a consistent supply.</p>
<p>Desalination has always seemed like a &#8220;natural fix&#8221; to me since we have adequate shoreline from which to pull seawater.  Although the costs you quoted for desalination of seawater from the Gulf of California at $2100/acre foot are high.</p>
<p>I googled Israel desalination since they have a few (maybe 4) plants doing this with their mostly costly plant desalting for approximately $740/acre foot.  Other countries such as Cyprus, Trinidad, Algeria, and Australia are desalting their water and Tampa, Florida has a plant working in conjunction with  Tampa Electric&#8217;s Big Bend Power Plant.</p>
<p>The Chairman of Water Desalination Administration in Israel, Abraham Tenne, feels it is necessary to expand desalination capacity in Israel in light of potential climate change (warming) in order to have a dependable water supply.  Google Israel desalination and his name and you can see his paper and the costs of water production for his and other countries&#8217; plants although the costs are in cubic meters of water (good math practice).  </p>
<p>If California and Nevada need more water they should start building ocean water desalination plants and either use our abundant natural gas to power the process or renewable energy &#8211; solar, wind, wave action, geothermal etc.  </p>
<p>Water is a precious commodity and looks to become more so as evidenced by the reduced flow in the Mississippi and the lower level in the great lakes.  We should learn a lesson from those countries located in dry areas that have already built desalination plants and consider their business model.</p>
<p>Dennis Martin<br />
Centennial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
